← All markets
By Request

Financial Markets

Counterparty verification is a handshake. Instrument provenance is a reconstruction. Position history is a conversation. SENTYAL makes all three into records.

Request market access →
The problem

Trust in financial markets is a claim without infrastructure.

In the Financial Markets market, the verification problem takes a specific shape. The records exist — but they are fragmented, unlinked, and ultimately held by individuals rather than systems. When the individual leaves, the record degrades.

SENTYAL replaces that fragility with architecture. Not a database. Not a filing system. A continuous, sovereign, self-maintaining chain that keeps pace with the institution whether its principals are present or not.

01
Problem 01
Counterparty verification is periodic and shallow
KYC and AML verification are conducted at onboarding and at intervals determined by compliance schedules. Between checks, status changes — ownership, sanctions exposure, regulatory action — go undetected until a transaction is already in motion.
02
Problem 02
Instrument provenance is reconstruction
Reconstructing the history of a financial instrument — who held it, when, under what conditions, through which intermediaries — requires querying multiple systems, many of which do not communicate. The reconstruction is incomplete by design.
03
Problem 03
Position history does not hold in litigation
Trade confirmations, settlement records, and position histories exist in systems designed for operations, not for evidentiary use. In litigation, regulatory investigation, or dispute resolution, the operational record is rarely sufficient.
The pattern
Every market. Same structure.
Fragmented records. Single points of failure. Provenance that lives in someone's memory. SENTYAL replaces each with architecture that runs without the keeper.
What SENTYAL does here
01

Continuous counterparty verification

Counterparty status monitored in real time against authoritative sources. Ownership changes, sanctions exposures, and regulatory actions surfaced immediately. Verification is current, not historical.

02

Instrument provenance chain

Every instrument's history documented: creation, transfer, settlement, current position. The provenance chain accessible without reconstruction. Material for regulatory response available immediately.

03

Position history as evidence

Trade and position records maintained in a form suitable for evidentiary use. Timestamped, cryptographically anchored, and structured to hold up in dispute resolution, regulatory inquiry, and litigation.

The Register

A position history on the register cannot be reconstructed differently for a different purpose.

What was recorded at close of day is what the register holds. No retroactive adjustment, no selective reconstruction, no version that changes depending on who is asking. The register is the audit trail that holds in regulatory inquiry, in litigation, in counterparty dispute — because it predates the dispute and cannot be altered by any party to it.

How the register works →
Next step

Financial infrastructure built to be held to.

An introductory conversation costs nothing and commits nothing. We describe the scope, the pricing structure specific to this market, and what embedding a dedicated team looks like.

Begin the conversation →